| Fox Body Mustang (Gen 3) 1979 - 1993 Ford Mustang news, tech, discussion, photos, and more! |
02-23-2010, 07:30 PM
|
#21 (permalink)
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 37
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
MegaSquirt
__________________
1988 5.0 with bolt-ons. Fast approaching 200k and still screamin'!
|
|
|
|
|
Last edited by DJ19885.0; 02-23-2010 at 07:38 PM.
|
02-23-2010, 07:57 PM
|
#22 (permalink)
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 37
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
As for tuning goes, after I got all the configurations set based on the car, engine, sensors, and what not, it was time to turn the key. It burped the first time which was a good sign that fuel and ignition were working and nothing fried, lol. The car wouldn't start with less than 20 percent throttle and I had to be on the throttle to keep it running at first, but I was very pleased that I had the car running just minutes after setting up the programming. First, I messed with the VE table by giving it more fuel. Then I figured out that the Idle control curve was WAY off, so I fixed that. After 20 minuted of tinkering, I had it idling on its own. I then set the trigger offset with a timing light so the computer knew exactly where it was at. It was far from a good Idle tune, but I was making progress. After more tinkering, I took it around the neighborhood with a friend and started data loging the drive. I got the idle a little better, and then called it a night. The next day I did more reading and messed with cranking pulse width and afterstart enrichment. It still didnt like starting cold at all, but it was getting better. Then I reviewed the datalogs and did more reading (your going to have to do a LOT of reading if you do this haha). I set the number of injections per cycle from 2 to 4 and WOW, did it run a hell of a lot smoother! After more tweaking, I had it idling just like it did stock! I messed with afterstart enrich and cranking pulse width again and did another cold start today, and it fired right up!! I am VERY happy with how this is going so far! If there wasnt snow on the ground I'd be out on the road tuning this thing, cant wait! This is by far the best investment in the engine I have done so far, mostly because it is forcing me to learn exactly the engine is controlled. I am learning a hell of a lot, and now I have one hell of a flexible computer that allows me to do a wide variety of mods to the engine for cheap! I'll keep you updated as my progress continues! Cant wait to see what happens when I can drive this thing!
__________________
1988 5.0 with bolt-ons. Fast approaching 200k and still screamin'!
|
|
|
|
|
Last edited by DJ19885.0; 02-23-2010 at 08:01 PM.
|
02-24-2010, 01:49 AM
|
#23 (permalink)
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: lynnwood, wa
Posts: 7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
i think you will be happy with what it can do, it is kinda based around GM stuff but it works great, i would run mega squirt if i had the cash.the sky is the limit here.
|
|
|
|
02-24-2010, 12:23 PM
|
#24 (permalink)
|
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,057
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
|
Re: MegaSquirt
Damn that's awesome. That beats having to get a retune after every performance mod. I'm surprised I haven't seen more of these
__________________

06-981
|
|
|
|
02-25-2010, 12:55 AM
|
#25 (permalink)
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: lynnwood, wa
Posts: 7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by david01130
Damn that's awesome. That beats having to get a retune after every performance mod. I'm surprised I haven't seen more of these
|
well like i said its kinda gm based, like hondata and chrome are for hondas megasquirt is more tailored to gm cars.so alot of ford people stay away from it. and not too many people run it on non boosted motors.
|
|
|
|
02-25-2010, 07:16 AM
|
#26 (permalink)
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 37
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Personally, I don't think its even worth mentioning that its "GM based". All that is gm based is the sensor calibrations and Idle control (at least for thr 5.0) . All you have to do for a ford 5.0 is calibrate the sensors and make an idle control circuit. It's hardly any work at all. Basically speaking, engines are engines and they are all run very similar... No offense or anything. And yes, i am planning on running boost as soon as cash flow permits!
__________________
1988 5.0 with bolt-ons. Fast approaching 200k and still screamin'!
|
|
|
|
|
Last edited by DJ19885.0; 02-25-2010 at 09:48 AM.
|
02-26-2010, 12:30 AM
|
#27 (permalink)
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: lynnwood, wa
Posts: 7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ19885.0
Personally, I don't think its even worth mentioning that its "GM based". All that is gm based is the sensor calibrations and Idle control (at least for thr 5.0) . All you have to do for a ford 5.0 is calibrate the sensors and make an idle control circuit. It's hardly any work at all. Basically speaking, engines are engines and they are all run very similar... No offense or anything. And yes, i am planning on running boost as soon as cash flow permits!
|
you will be well ahead of the game then, by then you will know how to really use megasquirt and it will be cake to get boost figured out. are you going turbo? header flip? or sc?
|
|
|
|
06-28-2010, 09:34 AM
|
#28 (permalink)
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 37
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Just a quick update on my progress (mostly cause im now on work-term and BS ing during lunch...)
I got the gas tune almost perfect, then installed a junkyard explorer intake, electric junkyard taurus fan, 70mm TB, 42 lb injectors and 225lph fuel pump. This of course took some adjustment to the tune, but after 20 mins, I was all set. Then, for the hell of it, I filled it up with e-85 and gave it a few more degrees of timing and messed with tuning with e-85 for a while. Once I got that tune down, I probably gained about 20 hp, but loss some mpg's due to having to run more fuel to compensate for the ethanol. (It actually works out cheaper per mile to run e-85 than 87 gas and its 105 octane, so its a win-win situation! Mostly due to the fact that the gas station around here sells it for 2.19 a gallon!) I edned up also purchasing a wideband o2 sensor, so I get accurate feedback to tune from, resulting in slightly better mpgs and a couple more hp =). I plan on installing gt40-p heads, a comp cams Xtreme Energy stage1 cam, new rings, seals, and what not in the next few weeks. I'll keep ya updated during lunch at work hah.
__________________
1988 5.0 with bolt-ons. Fast approaching 200k and still screamin'!
|
|
|
|
06-29-2010, 11:56 PM
|
#29 (permalink)
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 59
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
damn sounds like that will keep you busy. We need pics too!
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:32 AM.
|