Quote:
Originally Posted by junkyard_dog_gt
honestly a ls1 w/ 6 speed in my stang is what i want. well lets see any fox handles like azz. and now that i own a 4 wheel steer Honda prelude, these no mustang out there for me that will ever compare. ford can make power but they are cheap asses in handling. hell a 1990 Honda accord lxi handles better than the best ford mustang package.. irs or not. new stangs are a high rev pile of 4.6l junk, no workable torque. i prefer my 300+ ftlbs or torque at around 3200rpms not 7k. any gm thats not ls1 is a joke. so no ls1 gm= turds 305 or 350 doesnt matter=turds. a 5.0 of any year will beat a gm of same year period end of story. gm didnt step it up till after the 5.0 was discontinued with that modular peice of plastic crap
|
Nice to meet you. You must be the forum, as you'd say, jack azz. You saying a ricer can handle better than a V8 Mustang is like me saying a go cart can out handle a honda. It means nothing in terms of value. Front wheel drive is a whole different world, the car, by design will go where you steer it. Compare any import car that is rear wheel drive and and balanced like a V8 and we'll see what you say when comparing the two. Let's just say Honda can't and won't do that. After that we'll compare price. Then after that we'll compare aftermarket support. Mustang wins.
By the way the plastic isn't a bad thing for those running N/A set-ups on the (new) 4.6, it keeps the intake from heat soaking. On top of that, if you've ever raced in your entire life, you'd know that after coming off the line all of the shifts are made high up with the tach never bouncing below 4200.
Ford vs. Chevy
The Streaker Champion!
Linear Mode
